Is Dunbar's number up?

It is a question that plagues every socialite and socialette across the county; how many friends can one person have? Although this may seem like a complicated question with too many factors coming into play such as gender, geography and teenage acne levels, there is actually a simple answer. British anthropologist Robin Dunbar claimed that this number is 150. Beyond this, the brain cannot cope with any more he claims. Of course, this does not include people who you used to be friends with or people who you no longer maintain an inter-personal relationship with. The question I want to ask is do we need to revise this number? Due to the rise of social networking, is this number more like 1500, as would be suggested by the number on many teenagers friends lists?

I recentley re-did my Facebook due to work reasons and for a great opportunity to declutter (which also begs another question; can we now get rid of friends more easily?). In going through my old friends list, I added no less than 200 people who I felt a need to have on Facebook. All of these people I still maintain contact with, even if it is just a Happy Birthday comment once a year (or twice a year, if my friends have kindly taken over my Facebook account!). However, how real is that connection? Does chatting on Facebook account as a social interaction?

I don't think many people would argue that Facebook (and other Social Media outlets of course) don't make it easier to connect with people. Whether you want to or not, you can now keep up with your old schoolmates, work colleagues or distant family at the click of a button. But have a think; are these people really your friends? Can you really call them friends if the only reason you keep in touch with them is because Facebook makes it easier?

My opinion is yes. Just because a friendship is easier, does that make it any less valuable? We are always looking at ways to make our life easier. Remote controls for the TV, washing machines for the laundry and microwaves to cook our food. So why not make our social relations easier? Making them easier means we can have more right?

To sum up, I think Dunbar's number does need to be revised. Of course, there are already theories that put the number around 300, but these do not include the Social Media revolution. This is not to say that Social Media has replaced a social relationship, and in actual fact it can aid them. Facebook, as well as making contact easier online, allows much easier contact offline. Some people may feel sad that our lives are being reduced to the clicking of a button, but they may just have to accept that relationships are one thing to add to the list. If you don't agree, I can just defriend you anyway...

@paulcoffee

Facebook is faking it...

You have probably seen in the news recentley about over 80 million of Facebook's users are 'fake'. By 'fake', Facebook also means duplicate users and it is estimated that 8.7% of these users fall into this category. This also includes people who make profiles for other things; an unborn baby or a pet for example (trust me, it happens!).

A lot of the news has focused on how this is bad news for marketers, but is this the case? On the one hand, it could have serious consequences. Facebook Adverts allow you to target whoever you want, from anywhere in the world and from whatever demographic. Of course, if you use a one-size-fits-all approach then it is inevitable that you will catch some 'fake' users for the fee that you pay. As you pay per click or impression, some of this money will be wasted.

However, I am of the opinion that more is being made of the situation than needs to be. For me, Facebook is about conversation and interaction. The amount of Facebook likes at the top of the page does mean a little something, but it is what it leads to that is important. The real way to utilise Social Media is to measure ROC (return on conversation), which isn't easy, but it is important. Facebook allows you to raise brand awareness and build some sort of relationship with a consumer. If you manage to do this with a fake user, well done! However, this news doesn't affect bottom line.

The real consequences are going to be bore by the marketing budget. For marketers who do operate a blanket marketing strategy, it may be difficult to avoid these fake accounts. However, with a rethink of tactics and a realisation that what really matters is the true interaction with the real users, this news shouldn't scare too many people.

Facebook may have more fake users than Instagram has real users, but it also has 875 million real users. I wouldn't pull out of Facebook just yet...

 

 

 

@paulcoffee

The Happiness Machine

So after writing about Ambush Marketing in my last blog, I thought I would concentrate on another one of my favourite types of marketing; Experiential Marketing. This is also known as engagement marketing and this is exactly what it does; it engages people. The idea of it is to create a connection with the consumer (or a stranger, with the hope that they become a consumer of your brand) that they will never forget, hopefully leading them to purchase your product.

A good example of this which has been doing the rounds recently is the Coca-Cola happiness machine. In the example given below, the students approached the vending machine as they would any other. However, this wasn't normal vending machine and there is somebody sitting inside! It starts off by giving free Coca Cola to passers-by, but the ideas and gifts become more interesting and exciting. As you can see, the students love it!

This creates an instant connection with the people who are there to witness it. However, another important component of engagement marketing is viral marketing. The reason I have seen the Coca-Cola happiness machine is for this exact reason; it went viral. As well as interaction with the consumer in real life, everyone who shares the video (as I am doing now) is essentially giving free advertising to Coca-Cola. But lets be honest, it is pretty cool! This sort of thing goes viral on the internet, but I can imagine the students at this college told all their friends who told all their friends who told all their friends etc... (you get the picture!) They also drove a happiness truck round South America, amongst other things.

Another benefit of this type of marketing is that it can be very cost-effective if done in the right way. It doesn't cost too much to set up a vending machine and stick a guy in there I think most students would sit in there just for the free Coca-Cola.

Coca-Cola was perhaps too kind to the consumers though. To get something in life, you normally have to earn it. An Adelaide based snack brand, Fantastic Delites, set out to prove this point. Instead of just setting up a machine to give away free samples, they required people to do something to earn it. This started off with somebody having to press a button 100x, rising to 5000x and ending with a small child doing a pretty impressivee robot dance, leading to a well-deserved round of applause from the crowd who gathered to watch!

Both of the videos above are a marketers dream. They are inexpensive, effective and most importantly, get people talking, be it online or offline. For me, there are two aims in marketing. You want people to consume your product or service, but you also want people to talk about it (this is especially the case for non-commercial marketing; e.g government health campaigns). No matter how good a marketing campaign is, the best reccommendations are the ones from your friends. These both capture people's imagination by doing something simple, fun and engaging. What more could a marketer want?

@paulcoffee